INOD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Pegasystems has a net margin of 17.4% compared to Innodata's net margin of 24.26%. Innodata's return on equity of 75.22% beat Pegasystems's return on equity of 22.16%.

Innodata has a consensus price target of $74.00, signalling upside risk potential of 58.8%. On the other hand Pegasystems has an analysts' consensus of $105.36 which suggests that it could grow by 44.65%. Given that Innodata has higher upside potential than Pegasystems, analysts believe Innodata is more attractive than Pegasystems.

Innodata has a beta of 2.594, which suggesting that the stock is 159.365% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pegasystems has a beta of 1.248, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.778%.

Innodata has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pegasystems offers a yield of 0.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Innodata pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pegasystems pays out 10.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Pegasystems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Innodata quarterly revenues are $59.2M, which are smaller than Pegasystems quarterly revenues of $490.8M. Innodata's net income of $10.3M is lower than Pegasystems's net income of $119.1M. Notably, Innodata's price-to-earnings ratio is 54.85x while Pegasystems's PE ratio is 72.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innodata is 8.55x versus 4.40x for Pegasystems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LiveRamp Holdings has a net margin of 17.4% compared to Innodata's net margin of 5.74%. Innodata's return on equity of 75.22% beat LiveRamp Holdings's return on equity of 0.01%.

Innodata has a consensus price target of $74.00, signalling upside risk potential of 58.8%. On the other hand LiveRamp Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $39.29 which suggests that it could grow by 47.75%. Given that Innodata has higher upside potential than LiveRamp Holdings, analysts believe Innodata is more attractive than LiveRamp Holdings.

Innodata has a beta of 2.594, which suggesting that the stock is 159.365% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LiveRamp Holdings has a beta of 0.959, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.11%.

Innodata has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LiveRamp Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Innodata pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LiveRamp Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Innodata quarterly revenues are $59.2M, which are smaller than LiveRamp Holdings quarterly revenues of $195.4M. Innodata's net income of $10.3M is lower than LiveRamp Holdings's net income of $11.2M. Notably, Innodata's price-to-earnings ratio is 54.85x while LiveRamp Holdings's PE ratio is 2,659.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innodata is 8.55x versus 2.46x for LiveRamp Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NCR Voyix has a net margin of 17.4% compared to Innodata's net margin of -1.61%. Innodata's return on equity of 75.22% beat NCR Voyix's return on equity of 148.57%.

Innodata has a consensus price target of $74.00, signalling upside risk potential of 58.8%. On the other hand NCR Voyix has an analysts' consensus of $15.89 which suggests that it could grow by 65.68%. Given that NCR Voyix has higher upside potential than Innodata, analysts believe NCR Voyix is more attractive than Innodata.

Innodata has a beta of 2.594, which suggesting that the stock is 159.365% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NCR Voyix has a beta of 1.571, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.118%.

Innodata has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NCR Voyix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Innodata pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NCR Voyix pays out 1.57% of its earnings as a dividend. NCR Voyix's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Innodata quarterly revenues are $59.2M, which are smaller than NCR Voyix quarterly revenues of $682M. Innodata's net income of $10.3M is higher than NCR Voyix's net income of -$11M. Notably, Innodata's price-to-earnings ratio is 54.85x while NCR Voyix's PE ratio is 1.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innodata is 8.55x versus 0.44x for NCR Voyix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zvelo has a net margin of 17.4% compared to Innodata's net margin of --. Innodata's return on equity of 75.22% beat Zvelo's return on equity of --.

Innodata has a consensus price target of $74.00, signalling upside risk potential of 58.8%. On the other hand Zvelo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Innodata has higher upside potential than Zvelo, analysts believe Innodata is more attractive than Zvelo.

Innodata has a beta of 2.594, which suggesting that the stock is 159.365% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zvelo has a beta of 0.075, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.472%.

Innodata has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zvelo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Innodata pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zvelo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Innodata quarterly revenues are $59.2M, which are larger than Zvelo quarterly revenues of --. Innodata's net income of $10.3M is higher than Zvelo's net income of --. Notably, Innodata's price-to-earnings ratio is 54.85x while Zvelo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innodata is 8.55x versus -- for Zvelo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.